VI. Discussion of Correlation between Point Counting Data and Fracture Spacing Ration
A. Composition versus Fracture Spacing Ration
B. Porosity versus Fracture Spacing Ration
VII. Conclusions
VIII. References
## feel free to drop a comment
Is this how you're thinking Kinopio would format right "out of the box" (for lack of better term)? 👍 — yeah the placement was more my question, they seemed more fluid than I would expect Kinopio to be able to handle.
((Yes, I was thinking these cards would be one way Kinopio could represent an outline when imported. But the cards would be positioned more regularly since I manually placed this))
((Looking back at this after the comments in Discord… the root card annoys me… I understand why it’s there, but I wonder if that could be automated in a sense. Basically any “Parent” would be at the I level.))
((At the same time, this is how you could write an outline within Kinopio and have it be exported, because I think this captures all the requisite parts))
((Yeah, it could reasonably work without the root. You would go by y position to order the various "trees" that you find.))
((Yeah, at first I made it regular, and then I started playing around. I realized that could be a little confusing :P))
Probably superfluous, but it would be cool if Kinopio could create new connections based on outdents and where you are in the outline. Either a) when ever you outdent to the I, II, etc (top level) it would create a new color on next indent or b) on every outdent have the next indent as a new color
(()) The top level cards (I, II, etc) have one parent (`root`), second level (A, B, C) have two ancestors (the I/II level and root), etc.
(()) Exactly, that was part of my point for illustrating what the resulting structure might look like. I think using the same connection type for the whole outline is important for exporting. Different levels are represented by where the card is in the tree/graph.
VI. Discussion of Correlation between Point Counting Data and Fracture Spacing Ration
A. Composition versus Fracture Spacing Ration
B. Porosity versus Fracture Spacing Ration
VII. Conclusions
VIII. References
## feel free to drop a comment
Is this how you're thinking Kinopio would format right "out of the box" (for lack of better term)? 👍 — yeah the placement was more my question, they seemed more fluid than I would expect Kinopio to be able to handle.
((Yes, I was thinking these cards would be one way Kinopio could represent an outline when imported. But the cards would be positioned more regularly since I manually placed this))
((Looking back at this after the comments in Discord… the root card annoys me… I understand why it’s there, but I wonder if that could be automated in a sense. Basically any “Parent” would be at the I level.))
((At the same time, this is how you could write an outline within Kinopio and have it be exported, because I think this captures all the requisite parts))
((Yeah, it could reasonably work without the root. You would go by y position to order the various "trees" that you find.))
((Yeah, at first I made it regular, and then I started playing around. I realized that could be a little confusing :P))
Probably superfluous, but it would be cool if Kinopio could create new connections based on outdents and where you are in the outline. Either a) when ever you outdent to the I, II, etc (top level) it would create a new color on next indent or b) on every outdent have the next indent as a new color
(()) The top level cards (I, II, etc) have one parent (`root`), second level (A, B, C) have two ancestors (the I/II level and root), etc.
(()) Exactly, that was part of my point for illustrating what the resulting structure might look like. I think using the same connection type for the whole outline is important for exporting. Different levels are represented by where the card is in the tree/graph.